I did have a standing room only crowd. I enjoyed it and got some very positive feedback.
Here's one comment:
"These Resources slides are worth the time expended for the entire conference. Thank you.”
One issue I've had with QM got resolved in part at the conference. QM has a set of standards -- which you can only get by paying a membership fee. Standard 8 is their Accessibility Standard. I had looked at it when I was doing the iNACOL publication. I knew it was inadequate in relationship to meeting Section 504/508 requirements and communicated that with the QM folks. Their first reaction was:
Given the widespread lack of compliance with Sections 504 and 508, and recent court cases involving prominent institutions such as Harvard and MIT, this is still an area of law that is in dispute...
I pointed out it was not in dispute and pointed to the iNACOL publication. (I suspect that's why I was greeted by all the QM folks so nicely at the conference.
BUT, most importantly, shortly before the conference QM put out a disclaimer:
Disclaimer: Meeting QM's accessibility Standards does not guarantee or imply that specific country/federal/state/local accessibility regulations are met. Please consult with an accessibility specialist to ensure that accessibility regulations are met.
I take that as a win.
Here are the slides from my session.
1 comment:
Good..I also wanted to be the part of the session.Thank you for sharing the information you know.Thank you so much..To know about online education go to online journalism programs
Post a Comment